git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

advisability of CIFS/SMBFS

From
RMRustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com>
Date
Jul 13, 2009, 10:27 UTC
Message-ID
<f46c52560907130327n1fedcd9ch34a2a73a03b9af5c@mail.gmail.com>

I see a mention of CIFS/SMBFS on the faq and some mails but no clear position on whether its ok or not.

My question is in the following context:
- Our team (5-6 programmers) use windows and linux for development
- We are on a windows 'network neighborhood' type system (I guess this is CIFS?)
- there is a linux box for an (internal) server and some dual boots

If I can make a repo smbmounted on one of the linux partitions then we can push/pull from each others' repos almost like between local repos ie without ssh etc. Of course this assumes the directories are made suitably shareable by the team members.

Of course one could say: Whats the point of using the best distributed vcs without using the distributed features.

Well our reasons for git are:
- efficient branching and sophisticated merge, branch surgery with
rebase, cherry-pick
- mailing patches (sometimes people work from home)
- other goodies like interactive add, stash etc
So is smbmounting git repos ok or is plain ol' ssh safer/preferable?
Next: Sitaram Chamarty
Message 1 of 2 in “advisability of CIFS/SMBFS”
  1. Rustom ModyJul 13, 2009
  2. Sitaram ChamartyJul 13, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.