Re: git-log --full-history renamed-file

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 10, 2007, 01:40 UTC
Message-ID: <est24q$p4n$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <7v8xe53ok5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> 
>> There were patches floating around for an option called "--follow" to "git 
>> log", that would actually follow the renames. 
>>
>> I don't remember what happened to them - I suspect the implementation 
>> wasn't up to snuff. But the *concept* is definitely right.
> 
> Yes, the concept is good.  It was from Fredrik of
> merge-recursive fame.
> 
> The patch was not _bad_, but it looked a bit too intrusive back
> then and scared me away.

If I remember correctly it had somewhat unfortunate timing, as it was around changes in the same area.

By the way, while it is fairly easy to follow one file, it is hard to follow directory or glob... and there is a trouble that one file might come from two files (as concatenation for example; but I don't think git can detect it with default values of rename detection heuristics).

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git