Re: git-pull and tag objects
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 15, 2007, 01:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <er0cfg$1m7$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702132230490.3604@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> One thing that _might_ be a good idea for tags (if people _really_ want to > actually update tags under the same name) is to have a "parent" pointer > for tag objects, the same way we have for commits. That way you could - if > you really wanted to - create a chain of tags, and show the history of > them.
Wouldn't it be better to just use reflog for given tag? That assuming of course that we could protect tag reflog from pruning...
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git