Re: [BUG] Empty reflogs and "git log -g"

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 8, 2007, 19:37 UTC
Message-ID: <eqfu36$lb3$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702082021210.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:
> 
>>  when a reflog entry do not have a reflog message the refs@{num} syntax 
>> gives a different result than with 'git log -g'. Actually 'git log -g' 
>> just skips this ref.
> 
> I could be that some older git version produces empty messages. But I'd 
> regard the empty messages to be the problem. Or is the current Git version 
> still producing such entries?

StGIT used to produce no reflog messages; I don't know if this has improved. But you can have old reflog entries with empty messages; git log -g should deal with them IMHO.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git