Re: describe fails on tagless branch
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 7, 2007, 09:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <eqc4s4$nm9$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vr6t2g1dt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
[Cc: git@vger.kernel.org]
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl> writes: > >> Jakub Narebski escreveu: >>> >>> _Which_ INIT? In git there can be more than one root commit. In git.git >> >> I don't really care, but I would like git-describe to produce something >> useful in the absence of tags. The -g<SHA-1> already makes the commit >> uniquely identifiable. > > Then you would script like this: > > #!/bin/sh > git describe "$1" 2>/dev/null || git rev-parse --verify "$1" > > I do not think it a good idea to make "git-describe" itself do > the above, as the user of describe may want to fall back on > something other than "rev-parse --verify" after ||.
By the way, new git-describe gives us also number of commits since tag, and it would be nice to have number of commits since init... but that can be easily obtained using "git rev-list $1 | wc -l".
I guess that some use git-describe with --abbrev=0 to get closest preceding tag: getting INIT would confuse them.
That said, we could use e.g. INITg2a45ba+10-g4ee2ab
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git