Re: Handling of 'git-config foo=bar'
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 4, 2007, 20:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <eq5f34$ir9$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vsldlr8wg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes: > >> Currently, running "git-config foo=bar", ie. presumably an erroneous >> attempt at setting "foo", indeed queries "foo=bar", so outputs nothing >> and reports success. >> >> Do we want to allow "=" signs in config var names ? It would seem >> reasonable to refuse them, and report an error to the innocent user >> (OK, i'm not that innocent, but still ;) >> >> Or does that sound a bad idea to anyone ? > > Something like: > > git config remote.origin.fetch=refs/heads/master:refs/heads/origin > git config remote.origin.fetch+=refs/heads/next:refs/heads/next > git config remote.origin.fetch+=+refs/heads/pu:refs/heads/pu > git config remote.origin.fetch+=refs/heads/maint:refs/heads/maint > > sounds sensible. > > However, my feeling is "git repo-config" is primarily for use by > scripts, and we are better off educating users not to be afraid > of viewing and editing .git/config file themselves.
I think the question was not if we want new syntax for setting variables, but if we want to disallow '=' in variable (key) names. They are pretty restricted, and I cannot think offhand of variable name we would want that would need to have '=' in it...
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git