Re: [RFC] git-add update with all-0 object
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2006, 22:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <eknmju$9ok$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611301733460.9647@xanadu.home>
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > >> One thing that I think is non-intuitive to a lot of users (either novice >> or who just don't do it much) is that it matters where in the process you >> do "git add <path>" if you're also changing the file. Even if you >> understand the index, you may not realize (or may not have internalized >> the fact) that what git-add does is update the index with what's there >> now. > > And actually I think this is a good thing. This is what makes the index > worth it. Better find a way to make it obvious to people what's > happening.
Still, perhaps (perhaps!) it would be useful to have "intent to add" git-add.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git