git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

git-am vs. git-applymbox

From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date
Nov 5, 2006, 12:10 UTC
Message-ID
<eikkaq$au7$1@sea.gmane.org>

git-applymbox - Apply a series of patches in a mailbox git-am - Apply a series of patches in a mailbox

What are the differences between thos two commands, UI-wise and capability (feature) wise? Which one should I use? Which one do _you_ use?

And why git has yet another set of commands which do the same (well, git-annotate vs. git-blame "war" was won by git-blame, and git-pickaxe was born).

By the way, could we standarize somewhat short options for git commands, like -q for quiet, -v for verbose, -i for interactive, -S for pickaxe (search in diff), -n for some kind of no-op/do nothing (e.g. --no-commit), -f for force, -l for list, -k for skip errors/keep working even in the case of errors? It would be nice to have this in Documentation/API somewhere...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
Message 1 of 1 in “git-am vs. git-applymbox”
  1. Jakub NarebskiNov 5, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.