Re: [PATCH] git-fetch: Allow branch."branchname".remote=.
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 13, 2006, 12:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ego1ea$tsn$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0610131324090.14200@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> There is a subtle problem here. Up until now, "remote" meant a short cut. > You either had a file with that name in .git/remotes/ or .git/branches, or > an entry in the config (remote.<name>.url).
Not exactly. "git-pull . <branch>" and "git-peek-remote ." meant use _current_ repository. "." as remote name means "current", i.e. local repository.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git