Re: [PATCH] Multiple refs from the same remote in one git fetch
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 14, 2006, 10:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ebpket$7dt$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060814063309.GD21963@mellanox.co.il>
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>:
[...]
Show 18 quoted lines
>> I have been hesitant to claim that it does not make any sense to >> use more than one tracking branch for the same remote branch, >> because the only reason I might say so is because I haven't >> thought of a good usage pattern to do so. >> >> But apparently you do use more than one local branch to keep >> track of one remote branch. How do you use it for? Do you feel >> it is a good feature to be able to do that, or do you think it >> is just a mistake and more sensible error message is what we >> would really want? >> > > Well, what I was *trying* to do is simply add a more descriptive name for > the linus master branch to my existing tree. > So it seemed like an obvious idea to add > > Pull: master:origin > Pull: master:linus_master
Couldn't you do this via symlinks or symrefs?
BTW. Do we support symrefs other than HEAD, and does reflog works with symref heads, and symlinked heads?
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git