Re: [RFC] just an (stupid) idea when creating a new branch
- From
- Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 9, 2006, 06:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e5bfff550607082354g62e99216gc72b07055762de3a@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <e8p8pj$jk3$2@sea.gmane.org>
On 7/8/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> moreau francis wrote: > > > Hi GIT folks. > > > > I'm a complete newbie on git development so excuse me if > > this idea is completely stupid. > > > > Would it be possible to let the user stick a short explanation > > on what a branch is supposed to implement during its creation. > > It would be possible when/if branch and remotes config would migrate > to .git/config. Currently too many I think relies on refs/heads being > simple sha1 of "top" commit. >
It is possible to add a message (and more) to a tag creating a tag object. FWIK this is not allowed for the other refs.
Why there is this (artifical?) difference between tags and the other kind of refs?
Marco