Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: render dash correctly
- From
Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 23, 2023, 18:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e3f57ef0-7544-8f35-fd97-fdcbe1144e7e@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAN0heSogz0cdhVJdiZhCc2_fcHzJggPjbS0wCAQkRh1uZMxLig@mail.gmail.com>
On 23/01/2023 12:04, Martin Ågren wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 10:01, Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com> wrote: > >> highlighted with a `$` sign; if you are trying to recreate these >> -example by hand, do not cut and paste them---they are there >> +example by hand, do not cut and paste them--they are there >> primarily to highlight extra whitespace at the end of some lines. > > OK, so this is one of the new ones compared to v1. I can see the > argument for adding some spaces around the "--" for consistency and to > make this a bit easier to read in the resulting manpage (which can of > course be very subjective), but then I can also see that kind of change
There are some less subjective guidelines. Asciidoc turns "--" into an em-dash.[1] In English, em-dash is almost always not surrounded by spaces (it is in French, for example), while en-dash is spaced in English when used instead of an em-dash.[2][3][4]
This means that it's all the other places that use " -- " with spaces that are incorrect.
References:
1. https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/syntax-quick-reference/#text-replacements
2. English Wikipedia is clear about its usage of en- and em-dashes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Dashes3. Chicago Manual of Style FAQ doesn't spell out the spacing, but it's
clear from examples:
https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/HyphensEnDashesEmDashes/faq0002.html4. More confirmation on English Language and Usage Q&A website on Stack
Exchange network: https://english.stackexchange.com/a/154998/54197> being left out as orthogonal to this patch.
Indeed, correcting spacing around dashes is orthogonal. Also, it might not be very desirable to have so much churn for spacing issues.
> This v2 patch looks good to me.
Thank you for review.
> Martin