Re: force a merge conflict
- From
- Brett Simmers <swtaarrs@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 10, 2008, 19:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e32b7bb40811101111o8c4334dj49a0c56c6dac6d15@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <81bfc67a0811091219t393ab1faj8d1c4df6de3c260c@mail.gmail.com>
> I tried that but I don't see that it's any different than a fast > forward in this scenario. Actually I don't see any difference between > it and a fast-forward.
If you want to be given a chance to edit the result before the merge commit, you probably want 'git merge --no-commit'.
-Brett