Re: [announce] gc
- From
Mike Ralphson <mike.ralphson@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 23, 2008, 15:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e2b179460812230706p12e4f052v960f162e08011ae6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081223082207.f31ab2a3.stephen@exigencecorp.com>
2008/12/23 Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Show 15 quoted lines
> > > You should find a better name. I mean, one for which > > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=git+YOUR-NAME-HERE > > > > has a chance to find you ... > > Ah, good point. > > Perhaps "git corporate hooks" or "git enterprise hooks". > > I'm a little cautious about using words like corporate/enterprise as > there is nothing exclusively "corporate/enterprise" about any of the > hooks in the project, we just happened to be on a corporate/enterprise > project when we came up with them.
As the workflows these seem to support are centralised (as you say these apply equally well in some non-corporate / enterprise projects), how about git-central?
Mike