Re: Git User's Survey 2007 unfinished summary (long)
- From
- David Tweed <david.tweed@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 5, 2007, 01:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e1dab3980710041848i3aba0072lf166233f8d967e30@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071005012726.GR2137@spearce.org>
On 10/5/07, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > 26. Which porcelains do you use? > > > > > > Multiple answers (one can use more than one porcelain). > > > > > > Answer (multiple choice) | Count > ... > > > other | 14
FWIW, I answered other there because I use my chronoversion hacky-scripts (in addition to doing some other fine-level work with at the low level git command line). Obviously it's not a general purpose porcelain and it's "deliberately not using" normal development practice because I do lots of loosely related speculative research rather than working on a well-defined "product". I was initially confused by what the index does (particularly since in those days it was often referred to as a cache) and so wrote the whole routines using low-level commands; if I was to do it again I'd have my script just call "git add" and then using the vanilla "git commit".
-- cheers, dave tweed__________________________ david.tweed@gmail.com Rm 124, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading. "we had no idea that when we added templates we were adding a Turing- complete compile-time language." -- C++ standardisation committee