Re: Subject: [PATCH] bloom: fix `make sparse` warning

> From: =?UTF-8?q?=C4=90o=C3=A0n=20Tr=E1=BA=A7n=20C=C3=B4ng=20Danh?=
>  <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
> 
> * We need a `final_new_line` to make our source code as text file, per
>   POSIX and C specification.
> * `bloom_filters` should be limited to interal linkage only
> 
> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi Junio,
> 
> This patch by Danh seems to have slipped through the cracks, so I decided
> to pass it along. The original version of this patch (which I don't seem
> to be able to find) clashed with one of Jeff's series [1], because they
> both fixed up a 'No newline at end of file' issue with test-bloom.c.
> Also as Danh points out [2], the original patch didn't fix up the test
> files.
> 
> Anyway, this fixes up some 8 sparse warnings on 'master' and 'next':
> 
>   $ diff sp-out sp-out1
>   17d16
>   < bloom.h:90:6: warning: no newline at end of file
>   20,22d18
>   < bloom.c:276:1: warning: no newline at end of file
>   < bloom.h:90:6: warning: no newline at end of file
>   < bloom.c:12:26: warning: symbol 'bloom_filters' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   33d28
>   < bloom.h:90:6: warning: no newline at end of file
>   163d157
>   < bloom.h:90:6: warning: no newline at end of file
>   366,367d359
>   < ./bloom.h:90:6: warning: no newline at end of file
>   < t/helper/test-bloom.c:6:30: warning: symbol 'settings' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   $ 
>   
> ... along with a further warning on 'pu', due to the 'ds/line-log-on-bloom'
> branch adding another '#include "bloom.h"'.