Re: Still using "git whatchanged"

From: jorg@ml1.net <jorg@ml1.net>
Date: Sep 3, 2025, 06:11 UTC
Message-ID: <decdbc61-6273-4173-8044-31658f33e207@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa53cioh5.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Sep 2, 2025, at 23:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> jorg@ml1.net writes:
>>
>> My point was merely that IMO "raw" is not the best name for that
>> option. When I specify "--raw" on the command line, I usually
>> expect the program to output similar data than without that
>> option, but of a less refined state or kind.
>
> Sorry, but you are 20 years too late for *that* party.  Once you
> invent a time machine and go back 20 years, you can advocate for
> different name(s) that may fit your personal preferences better
> there.
>
> But not here and not now.

See below:

>> I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this discussion, but if I were asked...

Given the circumstances, I vote for keeping "git whatchanged".

Regards, J