Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] wt-status: avoid passing NULL worktree
On 25/02/2026 17:11, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> This series isn't in next yet - shall I re-roll with an extra
>> preparatory patch changing is_current_worktree() and
>> git_worktree_git_dir() to use wt->repo, or are you happy to have that as
>> a separate follow up on top of these patches?
>
> Thanks for investigating how we got here. I do not have strong
> preference in the order, as long as we eventually get there.
In that case I'll send a follow-up series next week.
Thanks
Phillip