Re: git log --patch for a particular file
- From
Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2023, 10:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <d34d9b64-4760-43e8-975c-a3ef53048530@app.fastmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <75545e1c-ce62-4b49-983e-1e7b1afb2fab@gmail.com>
Hi
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, at 12:20, Victor Porton wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I want this: > > git log --patch -- server/src/api/docs.py > > to print changes only for the file server/src/api/docs.py.
That's how it works for me.
> Currently, it in some reasons outputs nothing (this seems not to be an > intended behavior and could be counted as a bug).
Does it output nothing on *merge* commits? That's intended.
Try using `-m` as well.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/37801468/1725151
> It is questionable, whether to output commit information (commit hash, > user email, etc.) for commits that don't change specified file(s). I > would vote to indeed output this information, not to confuse the user > about the order of commits.
You can customize the output with `--format=`.
> More generally, > git log --patch -- A B C > could log changes in files A, B, C (only).
If I name two files I only get commits that touch any of those files. And diffs only for them.
-- Kristoffer Haugsbakk