git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH 0/3] rebase: don't override --no-reschedule-failed-exec with config

From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 22, 2021, 11:48 UTC
Message-ID
<cover.1616411973.git.avarab@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<873d1fda948855510b07f9cb75d374c03d60a94e.1544468695.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

I recently started using rebase.rescheduleFailedExec=true and noticed this bug in its implementation. It's conceptually a relatively simple fix, but as noted in 3/3 rebase being a "start this operation, run other command verbs later" has an unintuitive interaction with our usual "command-line options override config".

!README FIRST! Everthing after this line has no relevance to this series, it's just a side musing on another (mis-)feature of --reschedule-failed-exec. !/README FIRST!

There's another bug/misfeature I've noticed with rebase.rescheduleFailedExec=true (although maybe it'll be argued by someone that it's a feature). Let's say you run:

    git rebase -x false --reschedule-failed-exec HEAD~2

You'll now land in a state of (according to our helpful PS1 code, but also the rebase state) of 2/4. Aside: Because you're rebasing 2 commits, we have 4 because of the 2x exec. So far so good and all of that's expected.

But now when you do "git rebase --continue" we'll fail as expected, but not as expected (at least I find it funny) bump the count to 3/5, then 4/6, 5/7 etc.

With my "I just read the code" hat on this makes perfect sense. Every time we process a TODO item we bump the count of processed items, and under --reschedule-failed-exec we simply push the command that just failed onto the list, hence the increasing done/TODO count when a command fails.

But I don't see how it makes any sense to expose this as UI via "git status" and __git_ps1. I asked git to process this item of 4 sequencer TODO items. If I fail an item it makes more sense that I just don't get past it, not that under the hood a new identical item is rescheduled for me. Just don't advance past the current item!

Now if I've tried X times to make the "make test" pass for each commit in my 3-commit series I'm going to be on item 10/12 or whatever. There's no way to just look at that and see where I'm at in the sequence.

As an aside it would arguably make more sense to report 1/3 instead of 2/6 for the first commit of 3 with a failing -x "make test", but you can have X number of "exec" items and a manually edited list etc.

So that's probably a no-go but at least once I'm used to it I know if i'm on 4/6 I'm on commit 2/3, with --reschedule-failed-exec you'll have no idea what 12/14 or whatever means for where you are in your 3-patch sequence, it has no relation to the TODO list you edited, just rebase-merge's own internal state.

Getting back on topic: This just seems like needlessly exposing an
implementation detail, I also asked to "pick" a commit, but if that
item "fails" e.g. due to:
    
    $ git rebase --continue
    You must edit all merge conflicts and then
    mark them as resolved using git add

We don't push a new "pick" item on the list and inflate the count, so why would we do that for "exec"? Just say the command failed, return its non-zero status from "git rebase --continue", and don't advance.

Maybe it is useful to keep track of the N number of failures, and e.g. report in __git_ps1:

    master|REBASE 2/6
    master|REBASE 2(tries: 1)/6
    master|REBASE 2(tries: 2)/6
Instead of the current:
    master|REBASE 2/6
    master|REBASE 3/7
    master|REBASE 4/8

To say I'm on 2/6, but that I've tried 3 times already and failed to advance past it.

Anyway, I don't have patches for this side-report/rant. Looking at the implementation it seemed more non-trivial than I was willing to quickly fix.

We bump the count fairly early before we even get to there being an "exec" item, to implement this proposed view of the world we'd need to defer that (or go back and edit it once we see "failed exec" and that we're using --reschedule-failed-exec).

I'm not familiar enough with the sequencer internals to know if trying that would lead us down a path of e.g. having inconsistent or bad state if we'd die in the middle of all of that.

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (3):
  rebase tests: camel-case rebase.rescheduleFailedExec consistently
  rebase tests: use test_unconfig after test_config
  rebase: don't override --no-reschedule-failed-exec with config
 Documentation/git-rebase.txt |  8 ++++++++
 sequencer.c                  |  5 +++++
 t/t3418-rebase-continue.sh   | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-- 
2.31.0.285.gb40d23e604f
Previous: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadgetNext: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Message 3 of 28 in “rebase: offer to reschedule failed exec commands automatically”
  1. 0/3 rebase: offer to reschedule failed exec commands automaticallyJohannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget, Dec 10, 2018
  2. 2/3 rebase: add a config option to default to --reschedule-failed-execJohannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget, Dec 10, 2018
  3. 0/3 rebase: don't override --no-reschedule-failed-exec with configÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Mar 22, 2021
  4. 1/3 rebase tests: camel-case rebase.rescheduleFailedExec consistentlyÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Mar 22, 2021
  5. 2/3 rebase tests: use test_unconfig after test_configÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Mar 22, 2021
  6. Phillip WoodMar 30, 2021
  7. 3/3 rebase: don't override --no-reschedule-failed-exec with configÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Mar 22, 2021
  8. Phillip WoodMar 29, 2021
  9. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonMar 29, 2021
  10. Phillip WoodMar 29, 2021
  11. Johannes SchindelinMar 24, 2021
  12. Phillip WoodMar 30, 2021
  13. 0/2 rebase: don't override --no-reschedule-failed-exec with configÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Apr 9, 2021
  14. 1/2 rebase tests: camel-case rebase.rescheduleFailedExec consistentlyÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Apr 9, 2021
  15. 2/2 rebase: don't override --no-reschedule-failed-exec with configÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Apr 9, 2021
  16. Phillip WoodApr 15, 2021
  17. 1/3 rebase: introduce --reschedule-failed-execJohannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget, Dec 10, 2018
  18. Elijah NewrenDec 10, 2018
  19. Johannes SchindelinDec 11, 2018
  20. Elijah NewrenDec 11, 2018
  21. 3/3 rebase: introduce a shortcut for --reschedule-failed-execJohannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget, Dec 10, 2018
  22. Johannes SixtDec 10, 2018
  23. Stefan BellerDec 10, 2018
  24. Junio C HamanoDec 11, 2018
  25. Johannes SchindelinDec 11, 2018
  26. Stefan BellerDec 11, 2018
  27. Elijah NewrenDec 10, 2018
  28. email lags, was Re: [PATCH 0/3] rebase: offer to reschedule failed exec commands automaticallyJohannes Schindelin, Dec 11, 2018

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.