Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] gitweb: introduce remote_heads feature
- From
Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2008, 18:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <cb7bb73a0811161021n250d2719qbdf80781b6f04a35@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vabbz35d9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> writes: > >> For example, because the only remote for the tree is the author's own >> private tree, or because the only remotes are the mirrors on gitorious >> or github. In both cases, there would be no reaso to waste resources, >> bandwidth and screen estate loading and displaying the remote >> references. > > Sorry, but you are not making sense. The above may be a reason not to run > gitweb in such a repository, but if you are viewing such a private tree, > perhaps thru instaweb, wouldn't you be interested in viewing them?
No, I'm talking about the PUBLIC tree whose only remote is the private one, or the gitorious/github mirrors, an example of the latter being the rbot tree http://www.ruby-rbot.org/gitweb/rbot.git
Show 6 quoted lines
>> OTOH, it might make sense to make remote_heads enabled by default (and >> overridable). > > Perhaps. I'll stop commenting on "should this be optional, if so what > should be the default" and let others chime in. Honestly I do not care > that deeply either way.
Me either, actually. 8-D
-- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta