Re: git-svn tags and branches

> "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 8/29/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> As I said in the part you quoted, if you have branch foo and tag
> >> foo, and if you are interested in talking about the tag 'foo',
> >> you say "tag/foo".  When you want to talk about the branch, you
> >> say "heads/foo".  Replace "foo" with "name" and I think you get
> >> your answer.
> >
> > The problem here is that you can have THREE things: the tag foo, the
> > branch foo, and the 'branch' under the tag foo, which is not the
> > branch foo.
>
> What do you mean?  "refs/tags/foo", "refs/heads/foo" and ...?
>
> You cannot have "refs/tags/foo/bar" if you have "refs/tags/foo".
>