Re: What is the diff between a --soft and a blank reset
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024, at 09:54, A bughunter wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> My reply to Chris.
>
> On Sunday, November 17th, 2024 at 02:57, Chris Torek
> <chris.torek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> * With `--mixed`, `git reset` adjusts `HEAD` as before --
>> it's usually wisest to not have it adjust anything for
>> this case, in my opinion -- and then goes on to copy the
>> files from the `HEAD` commit into the index.
>
> I didn't give any case: What are you talking about? It look's as though
> you are pasting a custom manpage for git-reset based on keyword
> matching. Essentially spamming the mailing list based on a keyword
> match. Yet another manpage being written by a thirdparty when having
> conflicting and scattered jargon makes it to where the user cannot
> communicate in a meaningful way about using the software. You vaguely
> show the difference (e.g. soft means job #1 and mixed means job #1 &
> #2) however not fully answering my pinpointed question "Does this from
> --soft: "leaves all your changed files "Changes to be committed", as
> git status would put it.'" mean soft leaves the adds indexed but before
> the adds were commit and without commit whereas --mixed would erase the
> index having adds ready to commit?" conscerning what the difference
> means in pragma. We and you need to learn English or get off of mailing
> lists: stop spamming. I say we because you are not alone.
Do you happen to use a translation program to write these emails?
--
Kristoffer Haugsbakk