Re: Individual file snapshots
- From
Mark Lodato <lodatom@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 13, 2010, 00:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ca433831002121633j5b96049bs71e539c96397aff4@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <ron1-5EFFD7.14390512022010@news.gmane.org>
Ron, I also could use a feature like this. Sometimes I just have some code that I don't want to just throw away, but it really doesn't go in the history. I usually just create a file called "junk" and add it to .git/info/excludes, but I'd rather have it stored in git.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Ron Garret <ron1@flownet.com> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Yes, I think the right answer is going to be something like this: > > git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/snapshots > git rm --cached -r . > git commit --allow-empty -m 'Snapshot branch' > > Then, to take a snapshot: > > git branch snapshot > git checkout master -- path > git add path > git commit -a -m 'Snapshot of [path]' > git checkout master > > (All of that will be in a script of course.) > > And to rollback: > > git checkout snapshot-[n] -- path > > Or something like that. I haven't actually tried this yet, but it seems > like it ought to work.
I took your idea and ran with it. In my version, I don't bother switching branches and instead use plumbing commands to get the job done. (This prevents issues if there's a conflict from the old commit.) Also, I record HEAD as an additional parent of the commit, so I can see where the commit came from.
I uploaded it as a Github Gist with a bunch of comments. (It's much nicer to read it with syntax highlighting.) You may be able to modify this to suit your needs. In particular, if you'd prefer it not to be a real branch, you could change $BRANCH to /refs/snapshots/foo or something like that to hide it.
http://gist.github.com/303142
The basic steps are:
backup .git/index git add -a git write-tree git commit-tree restore .git/index
I don't know much about git's plumbing commands, so I'd be interested in hearing from git experts to see if what I'm doing is a good idea.
> Am I right that 'git checkout branch' changes branches, but 'git > checkout branch -- path' doesn't? That's very confusing. Useful, but > confusing :)
Yes on both counts :)
-- Mark