Re: [Q] Encrypted GIT?
- From
Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2008, 13:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <c6c947f60803130627r45629099g33a0741f319dc99c@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080313125853.GA12927@mit.edu>
Show 5 quoted lines
> It's normally at this point that that you'd need to bring in a security expert to ask a > whole lot of questions about your exact use scenario, do a formal > threat analysis, since there are all sorts of unanswered questions > about what kind of key management solution you really need for your > situation.
Uh. This is for kind of hobbyist noncommercial usage, so there are not that much resources for bringing in security experts. :-)
Also I do not expect this data to be protected from determined (payed) professional attack -- a determined professional would probably be able to find some weaker spot elsewhere. However I do want such attack to cost enough to ward off idle amateurs and bored professionals. :-)
> It's usually not as simple as "just encrypt it".
> How many people need to have access to the to the repository?
Well, 2-5, up to ten, I guess. In immediate future -- two persons only. :-)
> Do you need to revoke access to the repository later?
Probably. But restricting remote access should be enough.
> Who is allowed to give a new person access to the repository?
To keep things simple, me myself only.
> etc., etc., etc.
Thank you, Alexander.