Re: Make a non-bare repo bare.

From: Tim Visher <tim.visher@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 16, 2009, 11:47 UTC
Message-ID: <c115fd3c0907160447m3be44bcci46aa9d812884a8f6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e24e5b90907160439i29171e9fka3baf6bf871a6011@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Junio C Hamano<gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> Tim Visher <tim.visher@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I recently had occasion to make a previously non-bare repo bare.  Is
>> there any way to do this?  It will not allow me to delete a branch
>> that I'm on so I wasn't sure how to proceed.
>
> Funny.
>
>    http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/123303
>
> It is posed as a question but describes the correct (and officially
> supported) procedure.

Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wish I didn't have to actually clone the repo anew but if that's how it is, oh well. :)

That wiki response seems to contradict what Junio said

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Sitaram Chamarty<sitaramc@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 6 quoted lines

> The linked procedure uses git clone --bare.  It is my belief (and
> please correct me if I'm wrong) that only a git clone --mirror
> actually does what you want here -- a mere "bare" clone would lose
> your remotes and their tracking branches would it not?
>
> If I'm wrong please correct me...

The linked wiki article seems to contradict what Junio said. I guess I'd go with Junio being somewhat authoritative on normative prodecudures in the git world. /me shrugs.

-- 
In Christ,

Timmy V.

http://burningones.com/
http://five.sentenc.es/ - Spend less time on e-mail