Re: [PATCH 1/1] read-cache: update index format default to v4

> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:30 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/25/2018 3:06 AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 11:32:23PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:15:30PM -0700, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
>>>>> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The index v4 format has been available since 2012 with 9d22778
>>>>> "reach-cache.c: write prefix-compressed names in the index". Since
>>>>> the format has been stable for so long, almost all versions of Git
>>>>> in use today understand version 4, removing one barrier to upgrade
>>>>> -- that someone may want to downgrade and needs a working repo.
>>>> What about alternative implementations, like JGit, libgit2, etc.?
>>> Speaking of libgit2, we are able to read and write index v4 since
>>> commit c1b370e93
>>
>> This is a good point, Szeder.
>>
>> Patrick: I'm glad LibGit2 is up-to-date with index formats.
>>
>> Unfortunately, taking a look (for the first time) at the JGit code
>> reveals that they don't appear to have v4 support. In
>> org.eclipse.jgit/src/org/eclipse/jgit/dircache/DirCache.java, the
>> DirCache.readFrom() method: lines 488-494, I see the following snippet:
>>
>>                   final int ver = NB.decodeInt32(hdr, 4);
>>                   boolean extended = false;
>>                   if (ver == 3)
>>                           extended = true;
>>                   else if (ver != 2)
>>                           throw new
>> CorruptObjectException(MessageFormat.format(
>> JGitText.get().unknownDIRCVersion, Integer.valueOf(ver)));
>>
>> It looks like this will immediately throw with versions other than 2 or 3.
>>
>> I'm adding Jonathan Nieder to CC so he can check with JGit people about
>> the impact of this change.
> 
> JGit is used both on the server (which doesn't use index/staging area)
> as well as client side as e.g. an Eclipse integration, which would
> very much like to use the index.
> 
> Adding Matthias Sohn as well, who is active in JGit and cares
> more about the client side than Googlers who only make use
> of the server side part of JGit.
> 
> Stefan
>