git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Bug: git worktree remove and overwritten directory

From
Jonathan Müller <jonathanmueller.dev@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 8, 2020, 14:07 UTC
Message-ID
<bfc471e6-c82e-ba22-79d1-349e071c6b17@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAPig+cTpcgunPNKrzfqKYRb3gVhYff7UiBza-xaTH9GqH_Y+gA@mail.gmail.com>
On 08.06.20 08:42, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:28 AM Jonathan Müller
> <jonathanmueller.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20.05.20 16:22, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>>> Git tries hard to prevent the same directory from being registered to
>>> multiple worktrees, however, there is not much it can do to prevent a
>>> person from shooting himself in the foot by making changes like this
>>> outside of Git's control. Thus, this seems like a case of "if it
>>> hurts, don't do it".
>>
>> I agree and didn't expect git to "work".
> 
> I just posted a patch series[1] which enhances "git worktree prune" to
> detect and deal with multiple worktree entries referencing the same
> path.
Excellent, thank you!
Show 28 quoted lines
> 
>>> However, "git worktree" could possibly do a better job of helping you
>>> recover from such a situation. In particular, I think it should be
>>> reasonably easy to enhance "git worktree prune" to detect this
>>> situation and automatically prune the non-main now-bogus worktree
>>> entry.
>>
>> At the very least, the somewhat confusing error message could be
>> replaced by a "you messed up the worktrees, please delete the
>> corresponding entry in .git/worktree" or something like that. But
>> enhancing `git worktree prune` would be better. It was, in fact, the
>> first command I ran to try and fix the problem.
>>
>> As said above, I think git worktree remove could issue a better error if
>> it detects multiple worktrees with an identical path.
> 
> Hmm, the message it printed complaining that you tried removing the
> main worktree seems pretty accurate since that extra worktree entry
> was indeed pointing at the main worktree. I suppose it would be
> possible to have "git worktree remove" also perform "corruption
> detection" so as to present additional information which might clarify
> the complaint. Of course, if that is done, then it would make sense to
> make all "git worktree" commands likewise report corruption. However,
> I haven't convinced myself that we need to go that far. Anyhow, the
> posted patch series[1] addresses the immediate problem.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200608062356.40264-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com/T/
> 

You're probably right. Fixing git worktree prune to handle the situation is sufficient for me, as that was what I tried.

Thanks a lot, Jonathan

Previous: Eric Sunshine
Message 6 of 6 in “Bug: git worktree remove and overwritten directory”
  1. Jonathan MüllerMay 20, 2020
  2. Shourya ShuklaMay 20, 2020
  3. Eric SunshineMay 20, 2020
  4. Jonathan MüllerMay 20, 2020
  5. Eric SunshineJun 8, 2020
  6. Jonathan MüllerJun 8, 2020

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.