git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] worktree remove: refuse a worktree in the middle of a rebase or bisect

From
PWPhillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date
Nov 2, 2026, 14:07 UTC
Message-ID
<bf554c5f-066c-4e58-a583-0f95aedecf95@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20261030142137.54750-2-me@jaspermayone.com>
Hi Jasper
On 30/10/2026 14:21, Jasper Mayone wrote:
> "git worktree remove" refuses a worktree with modified or untracked
"refuses to move" would be clearer
Show 8 quoted lines
> files unless --force is given, but it removes a worktree that is in
> the middle of a rebase, a "git am" session, a bisect or a cherry-pick
> or revert sequence when its files happen to be clean. The state of
> that operation lives in the worktree's own $GIT_DIR, so it is lost
> with the worktree. A rebase stopped at an "edit" or "break" line, an
> "exec" that failed, or a cherry-pick sequence after a conflict was
> resolved and committed is clean in this sense and still has work in
> progress.
Cherry picking or reverting a single commit that contains no new changes also looks clean, but there is still a cherry-pick operation in progress as CHERRY_PICK_HEAD exists. One could argue that, because the user doesn't really lose any work, we don't lose much by deleting such a worktree but we're still deleting a worktree that contains an in-progress operation. Fixing that case simply requires us to see if CHERRY_PICK_HEAD, or REVERT_HEAD exist.
Show 5 quoted lines
> Treat such a worktree as unclean: refuse to remove it unless --force
> is given, and name the operation in the message.
> > A worktree whose directory is already gone is still removed without
> --force, as before: the check is part of the check for a clean
> worktree, which is only done when the directory exists.
Sensible
> Reported-by: D. Ben Knoble <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
> Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
I'm not sure what I've done anything to help with this patch
Show 12 quoted lines
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc b/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc
> index e6e77252ab..da4c38f909 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/git-worktree.adoc
> @@ -142,9 +142,10 @@ the new working tree location.
>   `remove`::
>   >   Remove a worktree. Only clean worktrees (no untracked files and no
> -modification in tracked files) can be removed. Unclean worktrees or ones
> -with submodules can be removed with `--force`. The main worktree cannot be
> -removed.
> +modification in tracked files) can be removed. A worktree in the middle
> +of a rebase, a `git am` session, a bisect or a cherry-pick or revert
"bisect, cherry-pick or revert"
> +sequence is not clean either, "either" doesn't make sense, because you've not described the unclean case yet. This line needs folding as well.
> because removing it loses that state. Unclean worktrees or ones with submodules
> +can be removed with `--force`. The main worktree cannot be removed.
A list of the conditions that require --force might make this section clearer.
Show 8 quoted lines
>   `repair [<path>...]`::
>   > @@ -189,7 +190,9 @@ twice. If the destination is already assigned to some other worktree but is
>   missing (for instance, if _<new-path>_ was deleted manually), then `--force`
>   allows the move to proceed; use `--force` twice if the destination is locked.
>   +
> -`remove` refuses to remove an unclean worktree unless `--force` is used.
> +`remove` refuses to remove an unclean worktree, or one in the middle of a
> +rebase, `git am` session, bisect, or cherry-pick or revert sequence,
too many "or"s as above
Show 42 quoted lines
> +unless `--force` is used.
>   To remove a locked worktree, specify `--force` twice.
>   >   `-b <new-branch>`::
> diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
> index 77ecd0f71f..ed08de1f43 100644
> --- a/builtin/worktree.c
> +++ b/builtin/worktree.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>   #include "submodule.h"
>   #include "utf8.h"
>   #include "worktree.h"
> +#include "wt-status.h"
>   #include "quote.h"
>   >   #define BUILTIN_WORKTREE_ADD_USAGE \
> @@ -1408,6 +1409,32 @@ static void check_clean_worktree(struct worktree *wt,
>   			  original_path, ret);
>   }
>   > +/*
> + * A rebase, "git am", bisect or cherry-pick/revert sequence keeps its
> + * state in the worktree's own $GIT_DIR, and removing the worktree
> + * throws that away even when "git status" says the files are clean.
> + */
> +static void check_no_operation_in_progress(struct worktree *wt,
> +					   const char *original_path)
> +{
> +	struct wt_status_state state = { 0 };
> +
> +	if (wt_status_check_rebase(wt, &state)) {
> +		if (state.am_in_progress)
> +			die(_("'%s' is in the middle of an am session, use --force to delete it"),
> +			    original_path);
> +		die(_("'%s' is in the middle of a rebase, use --force to delete it"),
> +		    original_path);
> +	}
> +	if (wt_status_check_bisect(wt, &state))
> +		die(_("'%s' is in the middle of a bisect, use --force to delete it"),
> +		    original_path);
> +	wt_status_state_free_buffers(&state);
> +	if (is_directory(worktree_git_path(wt, "sequencer")))
> +		die(_("'%s' is in the middle of a cherry-pick or revert, use --force to delete it"),
> +		    original_path);
> +}
This looks correct, though I wish we had a standard function that returned an enum describing which operation was in progress, rather than having to open code this sort of thing.
Show 9 quoted lines
>   static int delete_git_work_tree(struct worktree *wt)
>   {
>   	struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -1461,8 +1488,10 @@ static int remove_worktree(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix,
>   	strbuf_release(&errmsg);
>   >   	if (file_exists(wt->path)) {
> -		if (!force)
> +		if (!force) {
> +			check_no_operation_in_progress(wt, av[0]);
This triggers the new check when the worktree directory exists - good.
Show 34 quoted lines
>   			check_clean_worktree(wt, av[0]);
> +		}
>   >   		ret |= delete_git_work_tree(wt);
>   	}
> diff --git a/t/t2403-worktree-move.sh b/t/t2403-worktree-move.sh
> index 69768c1207..4eb56a8911 100755
> --- a/t/t2403-worktree-move.sh
> +++ b/t/t2403-worktree-move.sh
> @@ -271,4 +271,63 @@ test_expect_success 'move worktree with relative path to absolute path' '
>   	test_cmp expect .git/worktrees/absolute/gitdir
>   '
>   > +test_expect_success 'remove worktree in the middle of a rebase' '
> +	test_when_finished "rm -rf mid-rebase; git worktree prune" &&
> +	git worktree add --detach mid-rebase init &&
> +	test_commit -C mid-rebase rebase-me &&
> +	test_must_fail git -C mid-rebase rebase -f -x false init &&
> +	test_must_fail git worktree remove mid-rebase 2>err &&
> +	test_grep "in the middle of a rebase" err &&
> +	test_path_is_dir mid-rebase &&
> +	git worktree remove --force mid-rebase &&
> +	test_path_is_missing mid-rebase
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'remove worktree in the middle of an am session' '
> +	test_when_finished "rm -rf mid-am patch; git worktree prune" &&
> +	git worktree add --detach mid-am init &&
> +	test_commit -C mid-am am-me &&
> +	git -C mid-am format-patch -1 --stdout >patch &&
> +	git -C mid-am reset --hard init &&
> +	echo conflict >mid-am/am-me.t &&
> +	git -C mid-am add am-me.t &&
> +	git -C mid-am commit -m conflict &&
> +	test_must_fail git -C mid-am am ../patch &&
> +	git -C mid-am reset --hard &&
If we're running a lot of consecutive commands in a worktree, it is clearer to use a subshell
	(
		cd mid-am &&
		...
	) &&
I wonder how hard it would be to extend the "setup" test to create a branch that has conflicts when it is applied with am, cherry-pick, or rebase, so that we don't have to set up the conflicts in each test.
Thanks
Phillip
Show 37 quoted lines
> +	test_must_fail git worktree remove mid-am 2>err &&
> +	test_grep "in the middle of an am session" err &&
> +	git worktree remove --force mid-am
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'remove worktree in the middle of a bisect' '
> +	test_when_finished "rm -rf mid-bisect; git worktree prune" &&
> +	git worktree add --detach mid-bisect init &&
> +	test_commit -C mid-bisect bisect-one &&
> +	test_commit -C mid-bisect bisect-two &&
> +	git -C mid-bisect bisect start HEAD init &&
> +	test_must_fail git worktree remove mid-bisect 2>err &&
> +	test_grep "in the middle of a bisect" err &&
> +	git worktree remove --force mid-bisect
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'remove worktree in the middle of a cherry-pick sequence' '
> +	test_when_finished "rm -rf mid-pick; git worktree prune" &&
> +	git worktree add --detach mid-pick init &&
> +	git -C mid-pick switch -c pick-src &&
> +	test_commit -C mid-pick pick-one &&
> +	test_commit -C mid-pick pick-two &&
> +	git -C mid-pick switch --detach init &&
> +	echo conflict >mid-pick/pick-one.t &&
> +	git -C mid-pick add pick-one.t &&
> +	git -C mid-pick commit -m conflict &&
> +	test_must_fail git -C mid-pick cherry-pick pick-src~1 pick-src &&
> +	git -C mid-pick checkout --theirs pick-one.t &&
> +	git -C mid-pick add pick-one.t &&
> +	git -C mid-pick commit --no-edit &&
> +	test_path_is_dir .git/worktrees/mid-pick/sequencer &&
> +	test_must_fail git worktree remove mid-pick 2>err &&
> +	test_grep "in the middle of a cherry-pick or revert" err &&
> +	git worktree remove --force mid-pick
> +'
> +
>   test_done
Previous: Jasper MayoneNext: Jasper Mayone
Message 18 of 33 in “worktree list: add --merged and --no-merged”
  1. 0/1 worktree list: add --merged and --no-mergedJasper Mayone, Oct 21, 2026
  2. 1/1 worktree list: add --merged and --no-mergedJasper Mayone, Oct 21, 2026
  3. Junio C HamanoOct 23, 2026
  4. Eric SunshineOct 24, 2026
  5. worktree list: add --branch to select worktrees by branchJasper Mayone, Oct 24, 2026
  6. Phillip WoodOct 25, 2026
  7. Phillip WoodOct 26, 2026
  8. Eric SunshineOct 28, 2026
  9. Junio C HamanoOct 28, 2026
  10. Kristoffer HaugsbakkOct 28, 2026
  11. Jasper MayoneOct 29, 2026
  12. Eric SunshineOct 29, 2026
  13. Phillip WoodOct 29, 2026
  14. Ben KnobleOct 29, 2026
  15. Phillip WoodOct 29, 2026
  16. 0/2 worktree: treat a branch being rebased or bisected as checked outJasper Mayone, Oct 30, 2026
  17. 1/2 worktree remove: refuse a worktree in the middle of a rebase or bisectJasper Mayone, Oct 30, 2026
  18. Phillip WoodNov 2, 2026
  19. Jasper MayoneNov 2, 2026
  20. 2/2 ref-filter: name the worktree of a branch being rebased or bisectedJasper Mayone, Oct 30, 2026
  21. Phillip WoodNov 2, 2026
  22. Jasper MayoneNov 2, 2026
  23. Junio C HamanoOct 30, 2026
  24. Jasper MayoneOct 30, 2026
  25. 0/4 worktree: treat a branch being rebased or bisected as checked outJasper Mayone, Nov 2, 2026
  26. 1/4 worktree remove: refuse a worktree in the middle of an operationJasper Mayone, Nov 2, 2026
  27. 2/4 doc: for-each-ref: say how to read %(worktreepath) safelyJasper Mayone, Nov 2, 2026
  28. 3/4 ref-filter: name the worktree of a branch being rebased or bisectedJasper Mayone, Nov 2, 2026
  29. 4/4 branch: do not mark the branch the current worktree is rebasingJasper Mayone, Nov 2, 2026
  30. Harald NordgrenOct 21, 2026
  31. Junio C HamanoOct 21, 2026
  32. Harald NordgrenOct 22, 2026
  33. Kristoffer HaugsbakkOct 22, 2026

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.