Re: [PATCH] git push --track
- From
Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 14, 2010, 01:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <be6fef0d1001131737i59b2e843ib032c30027520b54@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87eilt5uzx.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> writes: >> before I put up my comments on the patch, I wonder if git-push is the >> best place to add this feature, as git-push usually deals with >> "pushing" data to another repo. >> >> I think git-branch would be a better place to do this. > > No. I think push is absolutely the right place to do it. > > I very often create local branches and only later decide that I'd also > like to push them to a remote -- but just as often, or more often, I > never do so. It would be extremely annoying if I had to make that > decision at branch-time.
I'm not saying that the feature should belong to git-branch and so you have to make this decision at branch time - I'm saying that since this has got to do with modifying branches (sort of), it should be in there.
-- Cheers, Ray Chuan