Re: http: a non-curl_multi interface?
- From
Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 3, 2009, 11:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <be6fef0d0903030319k46bd5f9bx69148a920213038d@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.10.0903021412120.15587@yvahk2.pbagnpgbe.fr>
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> What I don't quite grasp (and I must admit I have not followed the critique > on this matter) is why using the multi interface of libcurl is a problem to > anyone as all libcurl versions in modern times features it. And if you have > a libcurl with it working badly, you have a too old libcurl anyway and > should rather upgrade... > > ... > > I don't see how that is true. In fact, properly used I would claim that an > application using the multi interface would in general use less connections > and do more connection re-use than otherwise. But of course it depends on a > lot of factors.
Hmm, there aren't any very obvious benefits are there?
In that case, I guess, an re-organization of the http api/curl usage would be more useful to git.
-- Cheers, Ray Chuan