Re: Weird behaviour of git status
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2009, 13:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bd6139dc0901160517ra26d69bw661816faaa91b339@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <2A29AD77-2B8D-4491-92C1-62F5FFFBB00F@wincent.com>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:44, Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> "git status" shows you what would be committed if you ran "git commit" with > the same parameters. So in your example, the output for "git status ." is > exactly as you would expect. > > This is stated in the man page.
This is one of the first things I stumbled on when I started using git. I often times wanted to do "git status -- pathspec" to see only what changed in a certain directory, rather than what would be committed if only the contents of that directory is committed.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier