Re: renormalize histroy with smudge/clean-filter
- From
- Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 8, 2025, 11:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ba65ce17-8768-4d60-aec6-badd12930b81@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BFGUa_DRBe1WLVfCOKh53+F15KxW_c_OZAMwZCxuAQCiw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Elijah and Josef
On 08/02/2025 00:23, Elijah Newren wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:34 PM Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 06:01:43AM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 3:13 AM Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> I also see I didn't look closely enough at Phillip's
> suggestion, which was:
>
> git rebase --root -x 'git add --renormalize . && { git diff --quiet
> --cached || git commit --amend --no-edit; }'
>
> which will work if you do a lot of manual work to resolve line ending
> difference conflicts. Since the git add at each step will modify the
> files on which the next commit is based, that causes the application
> of the subsequent commit to conflict,Indeed, I'd missed that (like you I've not actually used any smudge/clean filters)
Show 9 quoted lines
> and you probably will have
> difficulty seeing those conflicts since they tend to just be line
> ending differences. But, mixing that with Brian's suggestion, you
> get:
>
> git rebase --root -X renormalize -x 'git add --renormalize . && {
> git diff --quiet --cached || git commit --amend --no-edit; }'
>
> which should probably work if you have a linear historyI've tried that out with a small modification in the script below which seems to work. The modification is to add "--attr-source=$(git rev-parse HEAD)" between "git" and "rebase" so that git always has a .gitattributes file to read when rebasing commits that were made before that file was added. I wonder if we should add something about renormalizing a repository to the FAQ based on your footnote
> [1] The renormalize option to the merge machinery ensures that new > blobs produced by the merge have normalized content, and avoid > conflicts when the only differences between files are normalization > ones. This option does not ensure that new trees only reference new > content nor that they only reference normalized content; _any_ > pre-existing blobs in the repository are fair game for new trees to > reference. As per the manual: "renormalize...This runs a virtual > check-out and check-in of all three stages of a file when resolving a > three-way merge..." So, the existing behavior of the renormalize > option to rebase/cherry-pick/merge is correct. It may not be what you > want, but I don't think cherry-picking/rebasing/merging with the > renormalize option is the right tool for this job. >
Best Wishes
Phillip
--- >8 ---
#!/bin/sh
set -e
d="$(mktemp -d)"
cd "$d"
git init
echo "The quick brown" >file
git add file
git commit -m line-1
echo "fox jumps over" >>file
git commit -a -m line-2
echo "the lazy dog" >>file
git commit -a -m line-3
echo "file filter=space" >.gitattributes
git config filter.space.clean "sed -e 's/ */ /g'"
git config filter.space.smudge cat
git add .gitattributes
git commit -a -m 'add .gitattributes'
git reset --hard HEAD
git --attr-source=$(git rev-parse HEAD) rebase --root -X renormalize \
-x 'git add --renormalize . && { git diff --cached --quiet || git
commit --amend --no-edit; }'
git log -p