Re: [PATCH 2/8] commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commits
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 5, 2020, 11:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b8f393fa-fec8-205e-0987-f4f6ff9b3531@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <5bdbeaf374b6050670f800fcdd3b54ddd0750754.1588641176.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
On 5/4/2020 9:13 PM, Taylor Blau wrote:
Show 58 quoted lines
> When 'git commit-graph write --reachable' is invoked, the commit-graph
> machinery calls 'for_each_ref()' to discover the set of reachable
> commits.
>
> Right now the 'add_ref_to_set' callback is not doing anything other than
> adding an OID to the set of known-reachable OIDs. In a subsequent
> commit, 'add_ref_to_set' will presumptively peel references. This
> operation should be fast for repositories with an up-to-date
> '$GIT_DIR/packed-refs', but may be slow in the general case.
>
> So that it doesn't appear that 'git commit-graph write' is idling with
> '--reachable' in the slow case, add a progress meter to provide some
> output in the meantime.
>
> In general, we don't expect a progress meter to appear at all, since
> peeling references with a 'packed-refs' file is quick. If it's slow and
> we do show a progress meter, the subsequent 'fill_oids_from_commits()'
> will be fast, since all of the calls to
> 'lookup_commit_reference_gently()' will be no-ops.
>
> Both progress meters are delayed, so it is unlikely that more than one
> will appear. In either case, this intermediate state will go away in a
> handful of patches, at which point there will be at most one progress
> meter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
> ---
> commit-graph.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
> index 00da281f39..8f61256b0a 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.c
> +++ b/commit-graph.c
> @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static void compute_bloom_filters(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx)
>
> struct refs_cb_data {
> struct oidset *commits;
> + struct progress *progress;
> };
>
> static int add_ref_to_set(const char *refname,
> @@ -1328,6 +1329,8 @@ static int add_ref_to_set(const char *refname,
> {
> struct refs_cb_data *data = (struct refs_cb_data *)cb_data;
>
> + display_progress(data->progress, oidset_size(data->commits) + 1);
> +
> oidset_insert(data->commits, oid);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1342,12 +1345,17 @@ int write_commit_graph_reachable(struct object_directory *odb,
>
> memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
> data.commits = &commits;
> + if (flags & COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_PROGRESS)
> + data.progress = start_delayed_progress(
> + _("Finding reachable commits"), 0);Is this the right phrase to use? This seems too close to the progress indicator "Expanding reachable commits in commit graph" which is walking commits.
An alternative could be: "Collecting referenced commits"
Outside of this string, I have no complaints. I also don't feel too strongly about the string, either.
Thanks, -Stolee