Re: Status of kha/experimental

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 9, 2007, 21:10 UTC
Message-ID: <b0943d9e0710091410w1559f1a0yb5055182fd289646@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071007213307.GA32210@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>

On 07/10/2007, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> On 2007-10-07 22:18:44 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > How stable is the kha/experimental branch? Since there are more and
> > more bugs added to the tracking system, I'll have to start looking
> > at them before a 0.14 release. Is it worth merging the
> > kha/experimental now or we better wait for after 0.14?
>
> The idea is that experimental contains changes that need testing, but
> may not yet be ready for your master. (They are generally safe,
> though; I run StGit from my experimental branch at work, for example.)
> When I decide that they are ready, I move them to safe. If there are
> any patches you feel should be in safe rather than experimental, just
> ask. Or you could just take them directly from experimental without
> asking, of course. :-)

OK. My plan is to merge kha/safe and have a look at what seems safer to merge from kha/experimental. Fix bugs (and freeze the current features). Release 0.14. Merge kha/experimental entirely post 0.14 and test/stabilize it over couple of months. How does this sound?

-- 
Catalin