Re: StGIT and conflicts
- From
- Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 25, 2007, 10:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b0943d9e0705250300o419d1d7ld175b273dbed2429@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070524164038.GA27661@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
On 24/05/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
> The current behavior of StGIT is to not use the index for conflicts > like git does. What advantages does this have that are great enough to > motivate a deviation from the git behavior?
I don't think there are any advantages in deviating from the git behaviour, only that when I first implementing it, git didn't have any smarter behaviour and I used diff3 (or other external merger, which can be used right now as well).
I'm not sure if git-diff still works when there are conflicts in the index. The current stg behaviour is to reset the index to the base of the patch and a stg diff would show the diff (including the config markers) to the base. I find this quite handy.
-- Catalin