Re: bug?: stgit creates (unneccessary?) conflicts when pulling

> On 27/02/06, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > An idea (untested, I don't even know whether it's feasible) would be to
> > check which patches were merged by reverse-applying them starting with
> > the last. In this situation, all the merged patches should just revert
> > their changes. You only need to do a git-diff between the bottom and the
> > top of the patch and git-apply the output (maybe without even modifying
> > the tree). If this operation succeeds, the patch was integrated and you
> > don't even need to push it.
>
> I tried some simple tests with the idea above. I attached a patch if
> you'd like to try (I won't push it to the main StGIT repository yet.
> For safety reasons, it only skips the merged patches when pushing
> them. A future version could simply delete the merged patches.