Re: [PATCH 1/2] object-file: lift ODB reprepare out of packfile flush
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Sep 24, 2026, 05:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <arS77zUvWKdjEeS-@pks.im>
- In-Reply-To
- <arQ8nsUzg9atdCeD@denethor>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 04:04:55PM -0500, Justin Tobler wrote:
Show 46 quoted lines
> On 26/09/23 03:16PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2026 at 03:26:21PM -0500, Justin Tobler wrote:
> > > diff --git a/object-file.c b/object-file.c
> > > index a4cbf8b081df..0f123b79fad1 100644
> > > --- a/object-file.c
> > > +++ b/object-file.c
> > > @@ -909,8 +907,10 @@ static int odb_transaction_files_write_object_stream(struct odb_transaction *bas
> > > * to zlib compression and is sufficient for this check.
> > > */
> > > if (state->nr_written && pack_size_limit_cfg &&
> > > - pack_size_limit_cfg < state->offset + stream->size)
> > > + pack_size_limit_cfg < state->offset + stream->size) {
> > > flush_packfile_transaction(transaction);
> > > + odb_reprepare(transaction->base.source->odb);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > CALLOC_ARRAY(idx, 1);
> > > prepare_packfile_transaction(transaction);
> > > @@ -1260,6 +1260,7 @@ static int odb_transaction_files_commit(struct odb_transaction *base)
> > > {
> > > struct odb_transaction_files *transaction =
> > > container_of(base, struct odb_transaction_files, base);
> > > + int have_packfile = !!transaction->packfile.f;
> > >
> > > if (transaction->objdir) {
> > > struct strbuf temp_path = STRBUF_INIT;
> > > @@ -1293,6 +1294,9 @@ static int odb_transaction_files_commit(struct odb_transaction *base)
> > >
> > > flush_packfile_transaction(transaction);
> > >
> > > + if (have_packfile)
> > > + odb_reprepare(transaction->base.source->odb);
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> >
> > One thing that I'm curious about: we don't have any error checking for
> > flushing the object directory at alll. So there is actually a change in
> > behaviour here, where we now also reprepare in case flushing has failed.
> > It probably doesn't matter much, but it does raise the question whether
> > we may want to start checking for errors.
>
> Regarding the behavior change, I'm not entirely sure I follow.
> `flush_packfile_transaction()` only returns early in the case where
> there is nothing to flush. In both of the above call sites,
> `odb_reprepare()` is only invoked in the same circumstance.There's a second early return when `tmp_objdir_migrate()` fails, and that early return causes us to not flush.
Patrick