git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFE] git rebase doesn't say it failed

From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date
Mar 10, 2008, 11:10 UTC
Message-ID
<alpine.LSU.1.00.0803101207120.3975@racer.site>
In-Reply-To
<429AC7A2-511E-496F-9C1C-4627604EBBFB@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Christian Holtje wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Hello!
> 
> What happened:
> I tried to do a rebase and got a message about files "needs update".
> However, it didn't say it did a rebase nor did it say that it failed.

It told you that a file is dirty. Git kinda expects you to know that it will not start a rebase on a dirty working directory.

So there _was_ an (implicit) message saying that it failed.
> Git was unable to rebase due to the files above.  Please commit them or move
> them out of the way.
> Hint: See "git reset --help" for a suggestion about saving work in progress.

The same comment I gave last week applies here: people complained that Git was too chatty. I tend to agree, since the important information was lost in the huge amount of text. Now you say we should make it chatty again?

Hth, Dscho

Previous: Christian HoltjeNext: Jakub Narebski
Message 2 of 5 in “[RFE] git rebase doesn't say it failed”
  1. Christian HoltjeMar 10, 2008
  2. Johannes SchindelinMar 10, 2008
  3. Jakub NarebskiMar 10, 2008
  4. Johannes SchindelinMar 10, 2008
  5. Christian HoltjeMar 10, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.