Re: Remotes order in "git remote update"
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Mar 9, 2008, 20:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803092148480.3975@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <2008-03-09-12-21-35+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net>
Hi,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On 9/03, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > | Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net> writes: > | > | > It looks like remote repositories are ordered alphabetically by their > | > local names when doing a "git remote update". > | > | I think the reimplementaiton in 'next' that will hopefully be in 1.5.5 > | will keep the list of remotes in the order read from the config. > > Indeed it does, thanks.
Well, technically this is a regression.
If you really want to order your remotes, why not add something like
[remotes] default = my-first-remote my-second-remote [...]
to the config? That is what the (recently fixed in builtin-remote) remote groups are for...
Ciao, Dscho