git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git-log segfault on 00 graft

From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date
Mar 5, 2008, 12:43 UTC
Message-ID
<alpine.LSU.1.00.0803051335440.4448@racer.site>
In-Reply-To
<20080305050630.GX8410@spearce.org>
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > 
> > > I was playing a bit with grafts, and actually did this:
> > > 
> > >   echo '839affa3313011da783b5b8074a5c9805ee8503a 
> > > 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000' >.git/info/grafts
> > > 
> > > running `git log --topo-order` causes a segfault. Yes, I probably 
> > > "should not be doing that", but I think it at least should not 
> > > segfault.
> > 
> > Well, I agree with the first, but not the latter.  grafts are a really 
> > core and plumbing thing, and if you set it to something nonsensical, I 
> > think you should expect something like a segmentation fault.
> 
> I'm sorry, I don't know where you learned to program Dscho, but my 
> mentors always taught me that user input should be handled with care, 
> and SIGSEGV / SIGBUS / SIGILL is not handling with care!
I agree.
> We tell users to popuate the .git/info/grafts file.  By hand.
> Its user input.  We shouldn't segfault over a malformed entry.

Well, I disagree about the user input. .git/info/grafts can break tons of things, just by _existing_. So you definitely need to know what you are doing.

Just inserting random strings into the grafts file is not an option. It is not something that we should take pains to catch... just like a Unix system does not prevent "rm -rf /" as root.

So again, I do think that a segmentation fault is not good. But I disagree that you have to go to great lengths to prevent a segmentation fault when a user is fiddling with internals without even knowing what could happen.

IOW in this case, the _user input_ would have better been crafted with care, and it was clearly not.

But as has been pointed out, the segfault has been already fixed (most likely by one of Martin's patches), so the discussion about this particular problem is moot.

Ciao, Dscho

Previous: Shawn O. PearceNext: Björn Steinbrink
Message 4 of 5 in “git-log segfault on 00 graft”
  1. Jan EngelhardtMar 4, 2008
  2. Johannes SchindelinMar 4, 2008
  3. Shawn O. PearceMar 5, 2008
  4. Johannes SchindelinMar 5, 2008
  5. Björn SteinbrinkMar 5, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.