Re: [PATCH] Improve t6029 to check the real "subtree" case

From

Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>

Date

Feb 28, 2008, 14:57 UTC

Message-ID

<alpine.LSU.1.00.0802281456550.22527@racer.site>

In-Reply-To

<20080228123654.GE31441@genesis.frugalware.org>

Hi,

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Miklos Vajna wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:45:03AM +0000, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Why yet another file?  Why not enhance t6029, as suggested?
> 
> here it is.

Thanks.

> diff --git a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
> index 3900a05..35d66e8 100755
> --- a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
> +++ b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
> @@ -29,4 +29,51 @@ test_expect_success 'subtree available and works like recursive' '
>  
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'setup' '

I'd call this 'setup subproject', but that's just nitpicking.