Re: git-branch -m interprets first argument differently when two are supplied
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2008, 17:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802141720100.30505@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <47B477B8.5030209@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote: > > > >> It's the two argument case that both expects its arguments in a > >> different order than other commands _and_ is dangerous in the case of > >> -M. > > > > The order was specifically requested, as "mv" also has that order. > > Did you even read the original message? You point this out like it > hasn't already been mentioned.
Yes, I had read it, but I had the impression that the rationale for the current behaviour made a heck of a lot of sense.
> >Don't use it, if you don't know what you're doing. > > Gee, thanks for the advice.
You're welcome, as always.
Ciao, Dscho