Re: [PATCH 0/4] replace unsinged long with time_t
- From
Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date
- Nov 6, 2008, 21:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LRH.1.10.0811062203120.19166@yvahk3.pbagnpgbe.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0811061000430.3419@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In theory, some platform might have a 64-but "unsigned long long" time_t > even if the architecture is 32-bit (apparently windows used to do that if > you included <time64.h>, for example), but since we wouldn't take advantage > of that anyway, even then there is no real advantage.
It could also be worth to notice that there are even 64-bit architectures that feature 32-bit 'time_t'...
-- / daniel.haxx.se