Re: [PATCH v2] Fix fetch/pull when run without --update-head-ok
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2008, 16:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LNX.1.00.0810141200140.19665@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081014150227.GC4856@spearce.org>
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > > > I actually understand now why the tests started failing: the change from > > > > resolve_ref() to get_branch() as requested by Daniel are at fault: > > > > get_branch() does not check if the branch has an initial commit. > > > > So, my vote is to revert back to resolve_ref(), even if it needs more > > lines. > > Yes, I agree, resolve_ref() is the best thing to be using here, > even if it is more code. get_branch() validates the commit and we > don't want that. We really just want to know if the current branch > is going to be updated, we don't care to what/why.
It doesn't validate the commit; it doesn't even validate the symref. The resolve_ref()-using code validates the symref, and I think that's an error; we also don't care what state we'd update the current branch from.
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*