Re: [PATCH 2/5] Add git-sequencer documentation
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2008, 15:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LNX.1.00.0807301121270.19665@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0807301556140.3486@wbgn129.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote: > > > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > Whoa, does that mean that > > > > > > $ git checkout my-private-branch > > > $ git sequencer --onto=master > > > > > > will change _master_? > > > > Exactly. > > /me does not like that. I could see a new porcelain doing that, but not > the thing that will be called by rebase.
Yeah, an option to change which branch is current should be called something different. --onto is an initial reset --hard, not an initial checkout; it specifies the branch (or commit) that the sequence of changes are done on top of, not the branch that will contain them. "Onto" (as an english preposition) specifies a destination, not a location, so it doesn't make sense as the location that stuff is done.
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*