Re: [PATCH 9/9] Build in checkout
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Feb 6, 2008, 01:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LNX.1.00.0802051958440.13593@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802052244160.8543@racer.site>
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > I suggested that: to prevent the index from needing an update. > > > > > > This is quite important if you have a large working tree, and switch > > > branches from A to B. For example, "make" will punish you where it > > > hurts. > > > > This isn't used for switching branches; this is used for checking out > > paths. If you do "git checkout <not-head> -- <every single path>", make > > will punish you, but why would you do that? I'd guess that people are > > unlikely to have a significant number of non-changes in this piece of > > code, just because they wouldn't list things that they didn't think had > > changes. > > For convenience, you can also say > > $ git checkout -- <path> > > and expect checkout to not really touch the unchanged files.
That also doesn't use this function, which is only for reading the tree into the index if a tree is given. On the other hand:
$ git checkout HEAD -- .
With either git-checkout.sh or my code, touches all of your files.
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*