git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

did we ever resolve what "known to Git" should mean?

From
Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Date
Mar 6, 2019, 14:44 UTC
Message-ID
<alpine.LFD.2.21.1903060940470.6367@localhost.localdomain>
  going back to a couple threads:

https://marc.info/?l=git&m=151048015116473&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152690160605723&w=2

and i'm going to try to clarify what (if anything) was decided regarding the internally inconsistent phrase "known to Git." junio's take on this here:

https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152695527902711&w=2

was to banish the phrase entirely in favour of some combination of "tracked" and/or "added to the index."

  thoughts?
rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
Message 1 of 1 in “did we ever resolve what "known to Git" should mean?”
  1. Robert P. J. DayMar 6, 2019

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.