git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: x86 SHA1: Faster than OpenSSL

From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date
Aug 5, 2009, 23:13 UTC
Message-ID
<alpine.LFD.2.01.0908051545000.3390@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To
<alpine.LFD.2.01.0908051352280.3390@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> I actually looked at code generation (on x86-64) for the C fallback, and 
> it should be quite doable to re-write the C one to generate good code on 
> x86-64.
Ok, here's a try.

It's based on the mozilla SHA1 code, but with quite a bit of surgery. Enable with "make BLK_SHA1=1".

Timings for "git fsck --full" on the git directory:
 - Mozilla SHA1 portable C-code (sucky sucky): MOZILLA_SHA1=1
	real	0m38.194s
	user	0m37.838s
	sys	0m0.356s
 - This code ("half-portable C code"): BLK_SHA1=1
	real	0m28.120s
	user	0m27.930s
	sys	0m0.192s
 - OpenSSL assembler code:
	real	0m26.327s
	user	0m26.194s
	sys	0m0.136s

ie this is slightly slower than the openssh SHA1 routines, but that's only true on something very SHA1-intensive like "git fsck", and this is _almost_ portable code. I say "almost" because it really does require that we can do unaligned word loads, and do a good job of 'htonl()', and it assumes that 'unsigned int' is 32-bit (the latter would be easy to change by using 'uint32_t', but since it's not the relevant portability issue, I don't think it matters).

In other words, unlike the Mozilla SHA1, this one doesn't suck. It's certainly not great either, but it's probably good enough in practice, without the headaches of actually making people use an assembler version.

And maybe somebody can see how to improve it further?
		Linus
---
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Add new optimized C 'block-sha1' routines

Based on the mozilla SHA1 routine, but doing the input data accesses a word at a time and with 'htonl()' instead of loading bytes and shifting.

It requires an architecture that is ok with unaligned 32-bit loads and a fast htonl().

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 Makefile          |    9 +++
 block-sha1/sha1.c |  145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 block-sha1/sha1.h |   21 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index d7669b1..f12024c 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ all::
 # specify your own (or DarwinPort's) include directories and
 # library directories by defining CFLAGS and LDFLAGS appropriately.
 #
+# Define BLK_SHA1 environment variable if you want the C version
+# of the SHA1 that assumes you can do unaligned 32-bit loads and
+# have a fast htonl() function.
+#
 # Define PPC_SHA1 environment variable when running make to make use of
 # a bundled SHA1 routine optimized for PowerPC.
 #
@@ -1166,6 +1170,10 @@ ifdef NO_DEFLATE_BOUND
 	BASIC_CFLAGS += -DNO_DEFLATE_BOUND
 endif
 
+ifdef BLK_SHA1
+	SHA1_HEADER = "block-sha1/sha1.h"
+	LIB_OBJS += block-sha1/sha1.o
+else
 ifdef PPC_SHA1
 	SHA1_HEADER = "ppc/sha1.h"
 	LIB_OBJS += ppc/sha1.o ppc/sha1ppc.o
@@ -1183,6 +1191,7 @@ else
 endif
 endif
 endif
+endif
 ifdef NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER
 	export NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER
 endif
diff --git a/block-sha1/sha1.c b/block-sha1/sha1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8fd90b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/block-sha1/sha1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+/*
+ * Based on the Mozilla SHA1 (see mozilla-sha1/sha1.c),
+ * optimized to do word accesses rather than byte accesses,
+ * and to avoid unnecessary copies into the context array.
+ */
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <arpa/inet.h>
+
+#include "sha1.h"
+
+/* Hash one 64-byte block of data */
+static void blk_SHA1Block(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const unsigned int *data);
+
+void blk_SHA1_Init(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx)
+{
+	ctx->lenW = 0;
+	ctx->size = 0;
+
+	/* Initialize H with the magic constants (see FIPS180 for constants)
+	 */
+	ctx->H[0] = 0x67452301;
+	ctx->H[1] = 0xefcdab89;
+	ctx->H[2] = 0x98badcfe;
+	ctx->H[3] = 0x10325476;
+	ctx->H[4] = 0xc3d2e1f0;
+}
+
+
+void blk_SHA1_Update(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *data, int len)
+{
+	int lenW = ctx->lenW;
+
+	ctx->size += len << 3;
+
+	/* Read the data into W and process blocks as they get full
+	 */
+	if (lenW) {
+		int left = 64 - lenW;
+		if (len < left)
+			left = len;
+		memcpy(lenW + (char *)ctx->W, data, left);
+		lenW = (lenW + left) & 63;
+		len -= left;
+		data += left;
+		ctx->lenW = lenW;
+		if (lenW)
+			return;
+		blk_SHA1Block(ctx, ctx->W);
+	}
+	while (len >= 64) {
+		blk_SHA1Block(ctx, data);
+		data += 64;
+		len -= 64;
+	}
+	if (len) {
+		memcpy(ctx->W, data, len);
+		ctx->lenW = len;
+	}
+}
+
+
+void blk_SHA1_Final(unsigned char hashout[20], blk_SHA_CTX *ctx)
+{
+	static const unsigned char pad[64] = { 0x80 };
+	unsigned int padlen[2];
+	int i;
+
+	/* Pad with a binary 1 (ie 0x80), then zeroes, then length
+	 */
+	padlen[0] = htonl(ctx->size >> 32);
+	padlen[1] = htonl(ctx->size);
+
+	blk_SHA1_Update(ctx, pad, 1+ (63 & (55 - ctx->lenW)));
+	blk_SHA1_Update(ctx, padlen, 8);
+
+	/* Output hash
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
+		((unsigned int *)hashout)[i] = htonl(ctx->H[i]);
+}
+
+#define SHA_ROT(X,n) (((X) << (n)) | ((X) >> (32-(n))))
+
+static void blk_SHA1Block(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const unsigned int *data)
+{
+	int t;
+	unsigned int A,B,C,D,E,TEMP;
+	unsigned int W[80];
+
+	for (t = 0; t < 16; t++)
+		W[t] = htonl(data[t]);
+
+	/* Unroll it? */
+	for (t = 16; t <= 79; t++)
+		W[t] = SHA_ROT(W[t-3] ^ W[t-8] ^ W[t-14] ^ W[t-16], 1);
+
+	A = ctx->H[0];
+	B = ctx->H[1];
+	C = ctx->H[2];
+	D = ctx->H[3];
+	E = ctx->H[4];
+
+#define T_0_19(t) \
+	TEMP = SHA_ROT(A,5) + (((C^D)&B)^D)     + E + W[t] + 0x5a827999; \
+	E = D; D = C; C = SHA_ROT(B, 30); B = A; A = TEMP;
+
+	T_0_19( 0); T_0_19( 1); T_0_19( 2); T_0_19( 3); T_0_19( 4);
+	T_0_19( 5); T_0_19( 6); T_0_19( 7); T_0_19( 8); T_0_19( 9);
+	T_0_19(10); T_0_19(11); T_0_19(12); T_0_19(13); T_0_19(14);
+	T_0_19(15); T_0_19(16); T_0_19(17); T_0_19(18); T_0_19(19);
+
+#define T_20_39(t) \
+	TEMP = SHA_ROT(A,5) + (B^C^D)           + E + W[t] + 0x6ed9eba1; \
+	E = D; D = C; C = SHA_ROT(B, 30); B = A; A = TEMP;
+
+	T_20_39(20); T_20_39(21); T_20_39(22); T_20_39(23); T_20_39(24);
+	T_20_39(25); T_20_39(26); T_20_39(27); T_20_39(28); T_20_39(29);
+	T_20_39(30); T_20_39(31); T_20_39(32); T_20_39(33); T_20_39(34);
+	T_20_39(35); T_20_39(36); T_20_39(37); T_20_39(38); T_20_39(39);
+
+#define T_40_59(t) \
+	TEMP = SHA_ROT(A,5) + ((B&C)|(D&(B|C))) + E + W[t] + 0x8f1bbcdc; \
+	E = D; D = C; C = SHA_ROT(B, 30); B = A; A = TEMP;
+
+	T_40_59(40); T_40_59(41); T_40_59(42); T_40_59(43); T_40_59(44);
+	T_40_59(45); T_40_59(46); T_40_59(47); T_40_59(48); T_40_59(49);
+	T_40_59(50); T_40_59(51); T_40_59(52); T_40_59(53); T_40_59(54);
+	T_40_59(55); T_40_59(56); T_40_59(57); T_40_59(58); T_40_59(59);
+
+#define T_60_79(t) \
+	TEMP = SHA_ROT(A,5) + (B^C^D)           + E + W[t] + 0xca62c1d6; \
+	E = D; D = C; C = SHA_ROT(B, 30); B = A; A = TEMP;
+
+	T_60_79(60); T_60_79(61); T_60_79(62); T_60_79(63); T_60_79(64);
+	T_60_79(65); T_60_79(66); T_60_79(67); T_60_79(68); T_60_79(69);
+	T_60_79(70); T_60_79(71); T_60_79(72); T_60_79(73); T_60_79(74);
+	T_60_79(75); T_60_79(76); T_60_79(77); T_60_79(78); T_60_79(79);
+
+	ctx->H[0] += A;
+	ctx->H[1] += B;
+	ctx->H[2] += C;
+	ctx->H[3] += D;
+	ctx->H[4] += E;
+}
diff --git a/block-sha1/sha1.h b/block-sha1/sha1.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dbc719f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/block-sha1/sha1.h
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/*
+ * Based on the Mozilla SHA1 (see mozilla-sha1/sha1.h),
+ * optimized to do word accesses rather than byte accesses,
+ * and to avoid unnecessary copies into the context array.
+ */
+
+typedef struct {
+	unsigned int H[5];
+	unsigned int W[16];
+	int lenW;
+	unsigned long long size;
+} blk_SHA_CTX;
+
+void blk_SHA1_Init(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx);
+void blk_SHA1_Update(blk_SHA_CTX *ctx, const void *dataIn, int len);
+void blk_SHA1_Final(unsigned char hashout[20], blk_SHA_CTX *ctx);
+
+#define git_SHA_CTX	blk_SHA_CTX
+#define git_SHA1_Init	blk_SHA1_Init
+#define git_SHA1_Update	blk_SHA1_Update
+#define git_SHA1_Final	blk_SHA1_Final
Previous: Linus TorvaldsNext: Linus Torvalds
Message 37 of 60 in “Re: Performance issue of 'git branch'”
  1. George SpelvinJul 26, 2009
  2. Request for benchmarking: x86 SHA1 codeGeorge Spelvin, Jul 31, 2009
  3. Erik Faye-LundJul 31, 2009
  4. George SpelvinJul 31, 2009
  5. Michael J GruberJul 31, 2009
  6. Erik Faye-LundJul 31, 2009
  7. Johannes SchindelinJul 31, 2009
  8. George SpelvinJul 31, 2009
  9. Erik Faye-LundJul 31, 2009
  10. George SpelvinJul 31, 2009
  11. Michael J GruberJul 31, 2009
  12. Michael J GruberJul 31, 2009
  13. Carlos R. MafraJul 31, 2009
  14. Brian RistucciaJul 31, 2009
  15. George SpelvinJul 31, 2009
  16. Jakub NarebskiJul 31, 2009
  17. Peter HarrisJul 31, 2009
  18. Peter HarrisJul 31, 2009
  19. x86 SHA1: Faster than OpenSSLGeorge Spelvin, Aug 3, 2009
  20. Jonathan del StrotherAug 3, 2009
  21. Mark LodatoAug 4, 2009
  22. Linus TorvaldsAug 4, 2009
  23. Linus TorvaldsAug 4, 2009
  24. Jon SmirlAug 4, 2009
  25. George SpelvinAug 4, 2009
  26. Jon SmirlAug 4, 2009
  27. Dmitry PotapovAug 4, 2009
  28. Andy PolyakovAug 18, 2009
  29. George SpelvinAug 4, 2009
  30. Linus TorvaldsAug 4, 2009
  31. George SpelvinAug 4, 2009
  32. Junio C HamanoAug 4, 2009
  33. George SpelvinAug 5, 2009
  34. Johannes SchindelinAug 5, 2009
  35. Junio C HamanoAug 5, 2009
  36. Linus TorvaldsAug 5, 2009
  37. Linus TorvaldsAug 5, 2009
  38. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  39. Nicolas PitreAug 6, 2009
  40. Junio C HamanoAug 6, 2009
  41. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  42. Nicolas PitreAug 6, 2009
  43. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  44. Artur SkawinaAug 6, 2009
  45. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  46. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  47. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  48. Artur SkawinaAug 6, 2009
  49. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  50. Artur SkawinaAug 6, 2009
  51. George SpelvinAug 6, 2009
  52. George SpelvinAug 6, 2009
  53. Artur SkawinaAug 6, 2009
  54. Linus TorvaldsAug 6, 2009
  55. Artur SkawinaAug 6, 2009
  56. Artur SkawinaAug 6, 2009
  57. Artur SkawinaAug 6, 2009
  58. Erik Faye-LundAug 6, 2009
  59. Linus TorvaldsAug 4, 2009
  60. Andy PolyakovAug 18, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.