Re: Git commit generation numbers
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2011, 19:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.1107221530270.1762@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.2.02.1107221206370.11697@asgard.lang.hm>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, david@lang.hm wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > That is IF unknown headers are copied verbatim during rebase. For > > "encoding" header this is a good thing, for "generation" it isn't. > > commit headers are _not_ copied during rebase
Yes, this turns out to be true as I forgot that rebase is constructed on top of format-patch+am, and format-patch doesn't preserve the ancillary headers such as the existing "encoding" header, or the hypothetical "generation" header.
Nicolas